Recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries in view of lithium recovery: A critical review

By Chunwei Liu, Jiao Lin, Hongbin Cao, Yi Zhang, Zhi Sun. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019

691 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Due to the rapid expanding of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and electric vehicles (EVs), the projectfed demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is huge and might result in supply risks for natural lithium-containing reserves. After the service life, spent LIBs continuously accumulate in the market, and they are excellent secondary resources for lithium recovery. To alleviate resource shortage and to decrease potential environmental pollution caused by improper solid waste disposal, recycling of spent LIBs is motivated world widely in recent years. Previous studies have usually focused on the recovery of cobalt and nickel, which create high economic benefit. Recovery of lithium, however, has not been highlighted. In this article, state-of-the-art on spent LIBs recycling is discussed with emphasis on lithium recovery. In addition to understanding underlying mechanisms and physiochemistry features of various recycling methods, the possibility for industrial realization of each method is also evaluated. The complex processing steps limit the industrial implementation of hydrometallurgy-dominant methods, which usually reclaim lithium in the last step, resulting in a poor recovery efficiency of lithium. The pyrometallurgy-dominant approach is readily to scale up but lithium is lost in the slag phase. Therefore, the mild recycling (cleaner production) methods are recommended for future study since they take advantages of traditional pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy, and could decrease treatment temperature as well as acid/alkaline usage.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e81781e6a489200c7523c26ed2e09b88270c4df8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. S. Zandevakili
  2. M. Goodarzi
  3. E. Asadi Dalini
  4. Gholamreza Karimi

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

  1. S. Zandevakili
  2. M. Goodarzi
  3. E. Asadi Dalini
  4. Gholamreza Karimi

In Mechanical Engineering

  1. S. Zandevakili
  2. M. Goodarzi
  3. E. Asadi Dalini
  4. Gholamreza Karimi

Citations in the corpus