Wetting, adhesion and friction of superhydrophobic and hydrophilic leaves and fabricated micro/nanopatterned surfaces

319 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Micro-, nano- and hierarchical structures for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning and low adhesion (2009, methodology): “A (2009) An optical profiler was used to measure the surface topography of the patterned surfaces (Bhushan & Jung 2007, 2008).”
Natural and biomimetic artificial surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low adhesion, and drag reduction (2011, methodology): “, Tuscon, AZ) was used for different surface structures [47,25,26,27].”
Superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic plant surfaces: an inspiration for biomimetic materials (2009, unknown): “Water on such a surface gains very little energy through absorption and forms a spherical droplet, and both the contact area and the adhesion to the surface are dramatically reduced (Extrand 2005; Bhushan & Jung 2008; Li & Amirfaz 2008; Nosonovsky & Bhushan 2008a).”
Biomimetics: lessons from nature–an overview (2009, background): “Air pocket formation in the valleys can increase the contact angle for both hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces based on the so-called Cassie–Baxter effect (Bhushan & Jung 2008).”
Boiling heat transfer on superhydrophilic, superhydrophobic, and superbiphilic surfaces (2012, background): “SHPo surfaces self-clean [6], enhance condensation [7], mitigate frost buildup [8, 9], and reduce hydrodynamic drag [1, 10].”