Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics

By Keith Worden, G. Tomlinson. 2019

406 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e80e8bffb90a73c22eb37b08b04819d6f2ebd848

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Michael I. Friswell
2. P. Malatkar

Citations in the corpus

• Crack Modeling for Structural Health Monitoring (2002, background): “Worden and Tomlinson (2001) indicated that random excitation tends to make the nonlinearity difficult to detect from the measured frequency response functions, although the measured coherence may be used.”
• Nonlinear Vibrations of Cantilever Beams and Plates (2003, background): “Anderson, Nayfeh, and Balachandran (1996b), while studying the nonlinear vibrations of a parametrically excited beam, showed that inclusion of quadratic air damping in the analytical model significantly improves the agreement between experimental and theoretical results.”
• Damage identification using inverse methods (2007, background): “Since the nonlinearity introduced by a crack is often weak, many of the common testing techniques will tend to linearize the response (Leonard et al. 2001; Worden & Tomlinson 2001; Friswell & Penny 2002).”