Determinants of family migration: short moves vs. long moves

By S. Nivalainen. 2004

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Quality of Life and the Migration of the College‐Educated: A Life‐Course Approach (2008, background): “More recent studies (e.g., Jürges 2006; Nivalainen 2004; Swain and Garasky 2007) continue to emphasize the importance of marital status, often in combination with gender roles.”
Family migration and mobility sequences in the United States: Spatial mobility in the context of the life course (2007, background): “The average mover ratio and the split between long- and short-distance moves replicate what is generally known about mobility and migration distances (Nivalainen 2004) 6 .”
HOUSING TENURE, JOB MOBILITY AND UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE UK* (2008, background): “A significant body of research broadly confirms this hypothesis and the deleterious impact on labour market outcomes (McGoldrick and Robst, 1996; Büchel and Battu, 2003; Nivalainen, 2004).”
MIGRATION OF THE HIGHLY EDUCATED: EVIDENCE FROM RESIDENCE SPELLS OF UNIVERSITY GRADUATES (2012, unknown): “Gottlieb, Paul D. and George Joseph.”
Differences in opportunities? Wage, unemployment and house-price effects on migration (2010, unknown): “On the other hand, working wives – in particular if they contribute a large share to family income and have a stable labour force attachment – deter family mobility, making husbands likely to be tied stayers (e.g. Nivalainen 2004).”