Freezing thresholds and cirrus cloud formation mechanisms inferred from in situ measurements of relative humidity

By W. Haag, Bernd Kärcher, J. Ström, A. Minikin, Ulrike Lohmann, J. Ovarlez, Andreas Stohl. 2003

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Factors controlling the microphysical link between distributions of relative humidity above ice saturation in the upper troposphere and lowermost stratosphere and cirrus clouds are examined with the help of microphysical trajectory simulations. Our findings are related to results from aircraft measurements and global model studies. We suggest that the relative humidities at which ice crystals form in the atmosphere can be inferred from in situ measurements of water vapor and temperature close to, but outside of, cirrus clouds. The comparison with concomitant measurements performed inside cirrus clouds provides a clue to freezing mechanisms active in cirrus. The analysis of field data taken at northern and southern midlatitudes in fall 2000 reveals distinct differences in cirrus cloud freezing thresholds. Homogeneous freezing is found to be the most likely mechanism by which cirrus form at southern hemisphere midlatitudes. The results provide evidence for the existence of heterogeneous freezing in cirrus in parts of the polluted northern hemisphere, but do not suggest that cirrus clouds in this region form exclusively on heterogeneous ice nuclei, thereby emphasizing the crucial importance of homogeneous freezing. The key features of distributions of upper tropospheric relative humidity simulated by a global climate model are shown to be in general agreement with both, microphysical simulations and field observations, delineating a feasible method to include and validate ice supersaturation in other large-scale atmospheric models, in particular chemistry-transport and weather forecast models.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7e4b389de6353902c61ba78aa9648b73f9671fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

  1. Xiaohong Liu
  2. O. Stetzer
  3. Jiwen Fan
  4. Yuan Wang
  5. D. Cziczo
  6. Thomas Koop
  7. M. Krämer
  8. Harald Saathoff

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Xiaohong Liu
  2. Jiwen Fan
  3. Yuan Wang
  4. D. Cziczo
  5. Thomas Koop
  6. D. Murphy
  7. M. Krämer
  8. Harald Saathoff

Citations in the corpus