Active interoceptive inference and the emotional brain
By Anil K. Seth, Karl J. Friston. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2016
754 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We review a recent shift in conceptions of interoception and its relationship to hierarchical inference in the brain. The notion of interoceptive inference means that bodily states are regulated by autonomic reflexes that are enslaved by descending predictions from deep generative models of our internal and external milieu. This re-conceptualization illuminates several issues in cognitive and clinical neuroscience with implications for experiences of selfhood and emotion. We first contextualize interoception in terms of active (Bayesian) inference in the brain, highlighting its enactivist (embodied) aspects. We then consider the key role of uncertainty or precision and how this might translate into neuromodulation. We next examine the implications for understanding the functional anatomy of the emotional brain, surveying recent observations on agranular cortex. Finally, we turn to theoretical issues, namely, the role of interoception in shaping a sense of embodied self and feelings. We will draw links between physiological homoeostasis and allostasis, early cybernetic ideas of predictive control and hierarchical generative models in predictive processing. The explanatory scope of interoceptive inference ranges from explanations for autism and depression, through to consciousness. We offer a brief survey of these exciting developments. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Interoception beyond homeostasis: affect, cognition and mental health’.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7c98a4e938f2866cf17de9e565c4d18ee3274bd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Hugo D. Critchley
- Lisa Feldman Barrett
- Sarah N. Garfinkel
- Jean Decety
- Tor D. Wager
- R. Levenson
- Kristen A. Lindquist
- Kevin N. Ochsner
In Psychiatry and Mental health
In Philosophy
Citations in the corpus
- The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization (2017, positive): “…research suggests that interoception is at the core of the brain’s internal model and arises from the process of allostasis (Barrett and Simmons, 2015; Chanes and Barrett, 2016; Barrett, 2017; for related discussions, see Seth et al., 2012; Seth, 2013; Pezzulo et al., 2015; Seth & Friston, 2016).”
- Interoception and emotion. (2017, background): “Efferent autonomic responses can thus be viewed as descending ‘interoceptive predictions’ through their effects on peripheral physiology [3,43,44,45 ,46].”