Microfluidic devices for cellomics: a review

By H. Andersson, A. V. D. Berg. 2003

690 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Microfluidics for cell separation (2010, background): “However, the focus of the field has now been shifting more toward addressing the need for cell biology studies [4, 8, 29, 76, 99, 110].”
Recent advances in microscale pumping technologies: a review and evaluation (2008, background): “Strategies for the development of cell and biological analysis tools have also exploited microfluidic devices since they can be used to sample, trap, separate, sort, treat, detect and analyze biological materials ( Andersson and Van den Berg 2003 ).”
Blood-on-a-chip. (2005, background): “Nonetheless, cells can be explored using functional assays, by exposing them, on the chip, to precisely controlled microenvironments, revealing the particularities of cell response to stimuli or allowing one to probe into the intracellular mechanisms (104, 105).”
A Review of Automated Microinjection Systems for Single Cells in the Embryogenesis Stage (2016, methodology): “Second, there are noncontact techniques that include: microfluidics [138], [139], dielectrophoresis [140], electrorotation [141], electrowetting [142], ultrasonic”
A Review on Macroscale and Microscale Cell Lysis Methods (2017, background): “Microfluidic devices have show great promise in cell lysis and in general cell nalysis due to the similar operating size scale [6].”