Greening Aid?: Understanding the Environmental Impact of Development Assistance

By Robert L. Hicks, Bradley C. Parks, J. Roberts, M. Tierney. 2008

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7b6d122612dae794d407469edfc8690dee9d757

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

Citations in the corpus

Allocation of aid for adaptation to climate change: Do vulnerable countries receive more support? (2017, background): “…also use their aid to reward recipient merit—typically understood as good governance and democratic institutions—as well as to promote their own political, economic, and security interests (e.g. Alesina and Dollar 2000; Berthélemy 2006; Clist 2011; Hicks et al. 2008; Hoeffler and Outram 2011).”
The Politics of Effective Foreign Aid (2010, background): “…researchers to more precisely assess the causal effect of aid on particular outcomes, such as health (Gebhard et al. 2008, Ravishankar et al. 2009), education (Dreher et al. 2008), the environment (Hicks et al. 2008), and democracy (Finkel et al. 2007, Stevens et al. 2007, Nielsen & Nielson 2008).”
Coding Error or Statistical Embellishment? The Political Economy of Reporting Climate Aid (2011, background): “Public support is increased through greater evidence for the government’s climate change-related activities, especially if environmental objectives are considered important by the country’s population (see e.g., Hicks et al., 2008).”
Biodiversity, Governance, and the Allocation of International Aid for Conservation (2013, background): “Finally, given that larger, more populous countries tend to receive more environmental aid (Connolly 1996; Hicks et al. 2008), we hypothesize that recipient country population and geographic size will be positively associated with biodiversity aid.”