Neural-Symbolic Machine Learning for Retrosynthesis and Reaction Prediction.
By Marwin H. S. Segler, Mark P. Waller. 2017
512 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Computational Chemistry & Drug Discovery
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Philippe Schwaller
- Tommi S. Jaakkola
- Regina Barzilay
- Teodoro Laino
- Wengong Jin
- Ola Engkvist
- A. Pais
- Tânia F Cova
In Materials Chemistry
- Tommi S. Jaakkola
- Regina Barzilay
- Philippe Schwaller
- Wengong Jin
- Ola Engkvist
- A. Pais
- Tânia F Cova
- Teodoro Laino
In Molecular Biology
- Tommi S. Jaakkola
- Regina Barzilay
- Sepp Hochreiter
- A. Pais
- Tânia F Cova
- Günter Klambauer
- Wengong Jin
- Ola Engkvist
In Computational Chemistry & Drug Discovery
- Regina Barzilay
- Tommi S. Jaakkola
- Sepp Hochreiter
- Günter Klambauer
- Philippe Schwaller
- Teodoro Laino
- A. Pais
- Tânia F Cova
Citations in the corpus
- Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI (2017, methodology): “[24] This allows to mimic the expert’s intuitive decision-making.”
- Molecular Transformer: A Model for Uncertainty-Calibrated Chemical Reaction Prediction (2018, methodology): “Recent machine learning approaches employ template libraries that are automatically extracted from datasets of reactions [20, 21].”
- The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. (2018, methodology): “Segler et al. [76] used 3.5 million reactions as the training set for DNN.”
- Unsupervised Attention-Guided Atom-Mapping (2020, methodology): “This match is called atom-mapping and is crucial for numerous tasks like template-based reaction prediction (Coley et al., 2017; Segler & Waller, 2017) and retrosynthesis planning methods (Segler et al., 2018; Thakkar et al., 2020; Fortunato et al., 2020), reaction graph neural network algorithms…”
- Modern Hopfield Networks for Few- and Zero-Shot Reaction Prediction (2021, methodology): “004 * DNN (Segler & Waller, 2017) 0 .”
- DEEPre: sequence-based enzyme EC number prediction by deep learning (2017, background): “The use of reaction fingerprints, for instance, could be one viable solution for this (Segler and Waller, 2017).”
- Emerging materials intelligence ecosystems propelled by machine learning (2020, methodology): “Other approaches rely on classification models (NNs) for this selection task 214 .”
- Machine learning for molecular and materials science (2018, methodology): “…of ANNs with other learning techniques such as Boltzmann machines, are showing particular promise for predicting chemical synthesis routes by combining rules-based expert systems with neural networks that rank the candidates, 36 or rank the likelihood of a predicted product by applying the rules.”
- Machine Learning Methods in Drug Discovery (2020, methodology): “In a groundbreaking study conducted by Segler and Waller [84], an MCTS method using three NNs alongside 12.4 million transformation rules, retrieved through AI-based data mining, from all the available chemical synthesis literature at the time to generate a sensible workflow for CASP.”
- Predicting Organic Reaction Outcomes with Weisfeiler-Lehman Network (2017, methodology): “In Segler and Waller [14], molecules are represented based on their Morgan fingerprints, while Coley et al. [3] represents reactions by the features of atoms and bonds in the reaction center.”