Voluntary information programs and environmental regulation: Evidence from ‘Spare the Air’

By W. Cutter, Matthew Neidell. 2009

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Energy Efficiency Investments in the Home: Swiss Homeowners and Expectations about Future Energy Prices (2013, background): “…the US, policies that rely on individuals modifying their behavior voluntarily in the interest of environmental quality—such as programs where public is asked to limit or forgo driving on high-ozone days (Cutter and Neidell, 2009, and Cummings and Walker, 2000)— have been found to be ineffective.”
Bicycle Infrastructure and Traffic Congestion: Evidence from DC's Capital Bikeshare (2018, unknown): “Sexton (2012), however, provides an empirical counterpoint to Cutter and Neidell (2009) by examining general equilibrium effects induced by free-fare days for public transportation.”
From Fog to Smog: the Value of Pollution Information (2019, background): “As a point of reference, Cutter and Neidell (2009) find that when a “Spare the Air” alert is issued in the San Francisco Bay Area, daily traffic falls by 2.5-3.5 percent with the largest effect during and just after the morning commuting period.33 Graff Zivin and Neidell (2009) estimate that a…”