Why Battered Women Do Not Leave, Part 2

By O. Barnett. 2001

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e79e404d6492053323444287f8771f9ddd833f79

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Jennifer E. Storey
2. H. Hendy
3. T. Logan
4. Doreen Eggen
5. C. Gustitus
6. P. Kropp
7. K. McLeod
8. R. Walker

Citations in the corpus

• Why I Stayed/Left: An Analysis of Voices of Intimate Partner Violence on Social Media (2015, methodology): “We will discuss these findings in terms of the internal and external factors mentioned previously (Barnett 2001) that are often involved in a victim’s decision to stay in or leave an abusive relationship.”
• Pets in danger: exploring the link between domestic violence and animal abuse (2017, background): “Given that some victims do not recognize or define their relationships as abusive (Barnett, 2001), or have concerns about the reactions of others when disclosing experiences of DV (Edwards et al., 2012; Mahlstedt & Keeny, 1993; Sylaska & Edwards, 2014), online forums may provide an important…”
• Victimization and Substance Abuse among Women: Contributing Factors, Interventions, and Implications (2002, background): “Research also indicates that leaving a relationship is less likely for women who have more negative self-perceptions or low self-esteem (Barnett, 2001; I. Johnson, 1992; Knoester & Booth, 2000; Rusbult & Martz, 1995).”
• Decision to Leave Scale: Perceived Reasons to Stay in or Leave Violent Relationships (2003, background): “However, discriminant analyses in the present study found no significant relationship between any of the DLS subscales and relationship duration or family support, unlike past research results that greater reluctance to make the decision to leave a violent relationship is found for women who have ma”
• Using the Investment Model to Understand Battered Women's Commitment to Abusive Relationships (2006, background): “published in recent years (Anderson & Saunders, 2003; Barnett, 2001).”
• Assessment and Management of Risk for Intimate Partner Violence by Police Officers Using the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (2014, methodology): “In addition to being prevalent, IPV is also challenging to manage for several other reasons, including, but not limited to, the low rate of incarceration and high rate of community management, the high rate of recidivism, and the sometimes ambivalent attitudes of victims (Baldry & Winkel, 2007; Barn”