Evolutionary psychology and Bayesian modeling

By Laith Al-Shawaf, David Buss. 2011

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Some, for instance, have argued that Bayesian models simply re-express the cognitive model in mathematical language (see Murphy, 1993; Jones and Love, 2011; Bowers and Davis, 2012).”
Troubles with Bayesianism: An introduction to the psychological immune system (2018, background): “Nevertheless, there is no doubt that part of what is so impressive about Bayesianism is its quantitative power and precision (though that is also the source of some of the criticisms of the theory, for example, Endress, 2013 and Jones & Love, 2011).”
Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience. (2012, background): “Jones and Love (2011) categorized Bayesian theories somewhat differently, subdividing theories into what they called Bayesian fundamentalism and Bayesian enlightenment.”
One and Done? Optimal Decisions From Very Few Samples (2014, background): “Similarly, Jones and Love (2011) stress the importance of integrating the computational and algorithmic levels of description for a cognitively and neurally plausible account of human cognition.”