Dual-Process Theories of Deductive Reasoning: Facts and Fallacies

By Jonathan Evans. 2012

78 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Science & Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Mike Preuss
2. Mark P. Waller
3. Marwin H. S. Segler

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

1. Mark P. Waller

Citations in the corpus

• Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI (2017, background): “This can be due to steric or electronic effects, an incomplete understanding of the reaction mechanism, or conflicting reactivity in (1)In cognitive science, this can is explained via “System 1” and “System 2” in dual process theory.[6]”
• Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition (2013, unknown): “We ourselves have argued that many of the features in these property lists are only correlates (and not defining features) and that others have been mistakenly associated with Type 1 or Type 2 processing (Evans, 2012; Stanovich & Toplak, 2012).”