Automatic Multi-organ Segmentation on Abdominal CT with Dense V-networks

By Eli Gibson, F. Giganti, Yipeng Hu, E. Bonmati, S. Bandula, K. Gurusamy, B. Davidson, S. Pereira, Matthew J. Clarkson, Dean C. Barratt. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2018

662 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Automatic segmentation of abdominal anatomy on computed tomography (CT) images can support diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment delivery workflows. Segmentation methods using statistical models and multi-atlas label fusion (MALF) require inter-subject image registrations, which are challenging for abdominal images, but alternative methods without registration have not yet achieved higher accuracy for most abdominal organs. We present a registration-free deep-learning-based segmentation algorithm for eight organs that are relevant for navigation in endoscopic pancreatic and biliary procedures, including the pancreas, the gastrointestinal tract (esophagus, stomach, and duodenum) and surrounding organs (liver, spleen, left kidney, and gallbladder). We directly compared the segmentation accuracy of the proposed method to the existing deep learning and MALF methods in a cross-validation on a multi-centre data set with 90 subjects. The proposed method yielded significantly higher Dice scores for all organs and lower mean absolute distances for most organs, including Dice scores of 0.78 versus 0.71, 0.74, and 0.74 for the pancreas, 0.90 versus 0.85, 0.87, and 0.83 for the stomach, and 0.76 versus 0.68, 0.69, and 0.66 for the esophagus. We conclude that the deep-learning-based segmentation represents a registration-free method for multi-organ abdominal CT segmentation whose accuracy can surpass current methods, potentially supporting image-guided navigation in gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e77d17d21941ed10adf14800d4a28bbd0f7c6eca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Fahad Shahbaz Khan
  2. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  3. Luc Van Gool
  4. Ling Shao
  5. Dacheng Tao
  6. Salman Hameed Khan
  7. Alan L. Yuille
  8. Xiaogang Wang

In Oncology

  1. Huan Fu
  2. Nima Tajbakhsh
  3. Ruimao Zhang
  4. Lequan Yu
  5. Jianming Liang
  6. Radu Marculescu
  7. Md Mostafijur Rahman

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Huan Fu
  2. Lequan Yu
  3. Jiang Liu
  4. Jun Cheng
  5. Dong Yang
  6. Holger R. Roth
  7. Alan L. Yuille
  8. Salman Hameed Khan

Citations in the corpus