ASSESSING MULTI‐SPECIES RECOVERY PLANS UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

By J. Clark, Erik W. Harvey. 2002

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Threats, conservation strategies, and prognosis for suckers (Catostomidae) in North America: insights from regional case studies of a diverse family of non-game fishes (2005, background): “Instead, we highlight the fact that many species are regionally threatened and an increasing number are being listed as federally threatened or endangered by Canadian (Committee on the Status of Wildlife in Canada, and the Species at Risk Act (SARA)) and US (Endangered Species Act (ESA)) authorities”
Conservation Challenges of Predator Recovery (2016, unknown): “Multispecies plans have already been used to protect groups of plant species occupying similar habitat, although with questionable success rates (Clark & Harvey 2002).”
The Effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act: A Quantitative Analysis (2005, background): “The reason for the lesser effectiveness of multispecies plans is unclear, but it has been attributed to a lack of management focus and consequent lack of sufficient attention to each species’ needs (Clark and Harvey 2002).”
AN ASSESSMENT OF MONITORING EFFORTS IN ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY PLANS (2002, background): “This point is especially important considering the recent increase in multi-species and ecosystem plans, an increase largely in response to criticisms that the species-by-species approach is inefficient (Hutto et al. 1987, Gibbons 1992, Clark and Harvey 2002).”