A global wave parameter database for geophysical applications. Part 1: Wave-current turbulence interaction parameters for the open ocean based on traditional parameterizations

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A global wave parameter database for geophysical applications. Part 2: Model validation with improved source term parameterization (2013, methodology): “This estimation is much larger than the 2:5 TW of Kantha et al. (2009), presumably because their wave spectra are truncated at a maximum frequency of 0.4 Hz and thus underestimate the Stokes drift (Rascle et al., 2008).”
Observation of swell dissipation across oceans (2008, methodology): “If these modulations are linearized [e.g., Kudryavtsev and Makin, 2004 ], the swell dissipation rate becomes linear in terms of the wave energy, with a proportionality constant that typically depends on the wind, but which does increase with the swell steepness, as we observe here.”
Wave Modeling—Missing the Peaks (2009, unknown): “Although in this example, analyzed according to Queffeulou (2004) and Rascle et al. (2008), the new formulation introduced by Ardhuin et al. (2008), as shown in the plot, remarkably extends the low error range, it seems to fail similarly to the formulation of Bidlot et al. (2005) in the high wave…”
Numerical Wave Modeling in Conditions with Strong Currents: Dissipation, Refraction, and Relative Wind. J (2012, methodology): “For that reason we will not report here attempts at global numerical wavemodelingwith currents (e.g., Rascle et al. 2008), but only focus on experiments with relatively well known current fields.”