How far are we from the quantum theory of gravity
By Lee Smolin. 2003
191 citations recorded by the source corpus.
An assessment is offered of the progress that the major approaches to quantum gravity have made towards the goal of constructing a complete and satisfactory theory. The emphasis is on loop quantum gravity and string theory, although other approaches are discussed, including dynamical triangulation models (euclidean and lorentzian) regge calculus models, causal sets, twistor theory, non-commutative geometry and models based on analogies to condensed matter systems. We proceed by listing the questions the theories are expected to be able to answer. We then compile two lists: the first details the actual results so far achieved in each theory, while the second lists conjectures which remain open. By comparing them we can evaluate how far each theory has progressed, and what must still be done before each theory can be considered a satisfactory quantum theory of gravity. We find there has been impressive recent progress on several fronts. At the same time, important issues about loop quantum gravity are so far unresolved, as are key conjectures of string theory. However, there is a reasonable expectation that experimental tests of lorentz invariance at Planck scales may in the near future make it possible to rule out one or more candidate quantum theories of gravity.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e76ae438b77fb9706b77260471084818939f4668
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Matt Visser
- Stefano Liberati
- C. Barceló
- Ivan Debono
- G. Smoot
- Francisco S. N. Lobo
- D. Mattingly
- Erik Curiel
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Stefano Liberati
- Matt Visser
- C. Barceló
- Ivan Debono
- G. Smoot
- Francisco S. N. Lobo
- Giovanni Amelino-Camelia
- D. Mattingly
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Stefano Liberati
- Matt Visser
- C. Barceló
- Ivan Debono
- G. Smoot
- D. Mattingly
- T. Sotiriou
- Giovanni Amelino-Camelia
Citations in the corpus
- Analogue Gravity (2005, background): “Because the relevant mathematics is extremely difficult, and by and large not particularly well understood, it is far from clear which if any of these three standard approaches will be preferable in the long run [356].”
- General Relativity and Cosmology: Unsolved Questions and Future Directions (2016, background): “The third approach is quantum gravity [548], in which spacetime, as a dynamical field, is a quantum object.”