Memory, monitoring, and control in the attainment of memory accuracy

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Source monitoring 15 years later: What have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory? (2009, background): “…(or inappropriately embellishes) the encoding, consolidation, or remembering of the features of events usually reduces source memory accuracy, for example, dividing attention (Dodson et al., 1998; Gruppuso, Lindsay, & Kelly, 1997; Jacoby, Kelley, Brown, & Jasechko, 1989; Kelley & Sahakyan, 2003).”
Age Differences in Depth of Retrieval: Memory for Foils. (2005, background): “Even when diVerences in monitoring are found, the important diVerence might be in what is monitored (cf. Kelley & Sahakyan, 2003), resulting from qualitative diVerences in memory access, rather than diVerences in monitoring processes per se.”
Eyewitness memory: Balancing the accuracy, precision and quantity of information through metacognitive monitoring and control (2011, background): “A similar study (Kelley & Sahakeyn, 2003) reported parallel results, and in addition found that when attention is divided at encoding the monitoring process suffers and the response criterion decreases.”
False Remembering in the Aged (2006, background): “They also showed higher levels of confidence for falsely remembered, suggested items and reported more vivid details for suggested items than younger adults did (see Kelley and Sahakyan, 2003, for a similar pattern of inaccuracy and overconfidence in older adults).”