Machine super intelligence
By Shane Legg, Marcus Hutter, W. Johnson. 2008
65 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Alignment & RLHF
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Alignment & RLHF
- José Hernandez-Orallo
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Pedro A. Ortega
- Tom Schaul
- Laurent Orseau
- Julian Togelius
Citations in the corpus
- The Arcade Learning Environment: An Evaluation Platform for General Agents (2012, background): “To this end, different theoretical frameworks have been proposed to formalize the notion of “big” artificial intelligence (e.g., Russell, 1997; Hutter, 2005; Legg, 2008).”
- Measuring Intelligence through Games (2011, methodology): “We refer the interested reader to a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter in Legg (2008).”
- Space-Time Embedded Intelligence (2012, background): “In both Legg’s definition of intelligence [4] (based on AIXI [3]) and Russell’s bounded-optimality framework [10] (which embraces time and space constraints on the program of the agent), the agent is separated from the environment and therefore immortal.”
- Measuring universal intelligence: Towards an anytime intelligence test (2010, background): “In fact, in Legg's Ph.D. dissertation (section 3.1.7) [Legg 2008], it is shown that sequence prediction (which is used in Hernandez-Orallo and Dowe and Hajek's works) is a special case of what they call chronological environments (which is used in Universal Intelligence).”
- Statistical Language Models Based on Neural Networks (2012, background): “More theoretical reasons for using entropy as a measure of performance come from an artificial intelligence point of view [42].”
- Information-Theoretic Bounded Rationality (2015, background): “In agent design, it became especially apparent more recently, as we continue to struggle in tackling problems of moderate complexity in spite of our deeper understanding of the planning problem [Duff, 2002, Hutter, 2004, Legg, 2008, Ortega, 2011] and the vast computing power available to us.”
- Position: Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI (2023, unknown): “Legg (Legg, 2008) and Goertzel (Goertzel, 2014) popularized the term AGI among computer scientists in 2001 (Legg, 2022), describing AGI as a machine that is able to do the cognitive tasks that people can typically do.”