STUDIES OF THE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ADJOINT APPROACHES TO VISCOUS AUTOMATIC AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION

By Siva K. Nadarajah, Antony Jameson. 2001

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e745c47a170c4f35eac89ab7395fa609694176d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Gábor Janiga
2. Dominique Thévenin
3. Kyriakos C. Giannakoglou
4. D. Papadimitriou

In Computational Mechanics

1. D. Papadimitriou
2. Gábor Janiga
3. Dominique Thévenin
4. Kyriakos C. Giannakoglou
5. Costas Papadimitriou

Citations in the corpus

• Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using First and Second Order Adjoint and Direct Approaches (2008, background): “A comparison between the discrete and continuous approach can be found in [45, 46].”
• Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics (2008, methodology): “In previous works [43, 44, 74], the optimization problem was simple (single objective) and the Simplex method [28, 63] has been used to speed-up the computational procedure.”