From screening to quantitative sensitivity analysis. A unified approach
By Francesca Campolongo, Andrea Saltelli, Jessica Cariboni. Computer Physics Communications, 2011
441 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Mechanics of Materials, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e72d889a69bc3b43e291d79668da41c6aad5194f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
- Francesca Pianosi
- Thorsten Wagener
- Fanny Sarrazin
- Emanuele Borgonovo
- Anthony J. Jakeman
- Holger R. Maier
- Elmar Plischke
- Stefano Tarantola
In Mechanics of Materials
- Stefano Tarantola
- Bertrand Iooss
- Thorsten Wagener
- Francesca Pianosi
- Clémentine Prieur
- Emanuele Borgonovo
- Elmar Plischke
- Fanny Sarrazin
In Statistics and Probability
- Thorsten Wagener
- Francesca Pianosi
- Bertrand Iooss
- Clémentine Prieur
- Fanny Sarrazin
- Emanuele Borgonovo
- Stefano Tarantola
- Elmar Plischke
Citations in the corpus
- The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support (2020, positive): “Perturbations typically occur one at a time and by some specific ‘perturbation size ’ (Campolongo et al., 2011).”
- Global Sensitivity Analysis of environmental models: Convergence and validation (2016, methodology): “, 2011; Cosenza et al., 2013; Vanrolleghem et al., 2015). The adequacy of this screening threshold is tested in Tang et al. (2007), however the validation strategy used in that work (based on a visual approach introduced by Andres (1997)) has some limitations that we discuss and overcome here (more ”
- Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: A systematic review with practical workflow (2014, methodology): “Campolongo et al. (2011) show that radial-based design provides several advantages in terms of ef fi ciency and integration with subsequent AAT sensitivity analysis.”