Impact of inoculation with Azospirillum spp. on growth properties and seed yield of wheat: a meta-analysis of studies in the ISI Web of Science from 1981 to 2008

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Up to 52 % N fertilizer replaced by biofertilizer in lowland rice via farmer participatory research (2014, background): “greatest increase yields over uninoculated controls occurred when additional N fertilizer was completely absent (Veresoglou and Menexes 2009).”
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning (2013, unknown): “…transcriptomic study performed with Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS417r indicated that bacteria elicited a substantial change in the expression of 97 genes in roots whereas none of the approximately 8,000 genes tested showed a consistent change in expression in the leaves (Verhagen et al., 2004).”
Everything you must know about Azospirillum and its impact on agriculture and beyond (2020, methodology): “Most of the benefits have been observed during the early growth stages of plants with greater and more consistent responses seen in the root and shoot dry matter production and a minimal contribution to the grain yield components during the seed filling period (Díaz-Zorita and Fernández-Canigia 2009”
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria are more effective under drought: a meta-analysis (2017, background): “Although the positive effects of fungal symbionts under drought stress are summarized in several metaanalyses (Kivlin et al. 2013; Jayne and Quigley 2014; Augé et al. 2015), there is only one existing quantitative analysis on PGPR. Veresoglou and Menexes (2010) evaluated wheat-Azospirillum interacti”