Failure of aluminum foams under multiaxial loads
By G. Gioux, T. M. McCormack, L. Gibson. 2000
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e71f35f8cc50cc4c338a3022349fbf370b0df694
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Mechanical Engineering
- Norman A. Fleck
- V. Deshpande
- S. Kyriakides
- N. Triantafyllidis
- Lixin Gong
- H. Wadley
- J. W. Hutchinson
- A. G. Evans
Citations in the corpus
- Dynamic compressive behaviour of cellular materials: A review of phenomenon, mechanism and modelling (2018, unknown): “However, it seems that the phenomenological models fit experimental data better than the mechanism-based GAZT model which overestimates hydrostatic strength, and this overestimation is believed due to the bending deformation induced by mesoscopic structural imperfections, rather than the stretch/con”
- Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams (2000, methodology): “Gioux et al. (2000) reported yield data for closed and open cell aluminium foams under a variety of biaxial, shear and axisymmetric loadings.”
- On the stability of Kelvin cell foams under compressive loads (2005, background): “Triaxial loading Porous materials are usually tested under triaxial loading (e.g., Triantafyllou et al., 1989; Deshpande and Fleck, 2000; Gioux et al., 2000).”