The GNSS ambiguity ratio-test revisited: a better way of using it

By Peter Teunissen, S. Verhagen. 2009

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7112a7390f5a38ac8e9a7ca55e54efc3ef32d6f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Peter Teunissen
2. Yidong Lou
3. Jing-nan Liu
4. Chuang Shi
5. Shengfeng Gu
6. Jun Wang
7. Yanming Feng
8. Xiaohong Zhang

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Peter Teunissen
2. Yidong Lou
3. Jing-nan Liu
4. Chuang Shi
5. Shengfeng Gu
6. Xiaohong Zhang

In Oceanography

1. Peter Teunissen
2. Jing-nan Liu
3. Shengfeng Gu
4. Chuang Shi
5. Yidong Lou
6. Alireza Amiri-Simkooei
7. Xiaohong Zhang
8. Pan Li

Citations in the corpus

• BeiDou phase bias estimation and its application in precise point positioning with triple-frequency observable (2015, background): “Furthermore, concerning the critical value in the ratio test, there ismore reasonable way to determine it (Teunissen and Verhagen 2009; Wang and Feng 2013b).”
• The ratio test for future GNSS ambiguity resolution (2013, background): “As is shown in Teunissen and Verhagen (2009), the inequality (2) describes the z-translational invariant aperture pull-in regions of the ratio test (the red and dark-green areas in bottom panel of Fig.”