Reaction times and intelligence differences: A population-based cohort study

By Ian J. Deary, G. Der, G. Ford. 2001

366 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e705f9bbe92e05a96bf7765e9cc2f82648531fd2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Scott Barry Kaufman
2. Colin G. DeYoung
3. D. Liewald
4. Jack Nissan
5. G. Der
6. Ian J. Deary
7. José Hernandez-Orallo
8. Jeremy R. Gray

In Genetics

1. Scott Barry Kaufman
2. Ian J. Deary
3. D. Liewald
4. Jack Nissan
5. G. Der
6. José Hernandez-Orallo
7. Colin G. DeYoung

Citations in the corpus

• Associative learning predicts intelligence above and beyond working memory and processing speed (2009, result): “The finding of a significant relation between processing speed and g is also well supported by a large literature (Deary et al., 2001; Jensen, 2006).”
• Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. (2006, methodology): “A diagram and full description are given in Deary, Der, and Ford (2001).”
• Processing speed, intelligence, creativity, and school performance: Testing of causal hypotheses using structural equation models (2004, neutral): “50j (Deary, 2001).”
• Evaluation in artificial intelligence: from task-oriented to ability-oriented measurement (2017, background): “For instance, is it reasonable to expect that well-established tests of choice reaction time be correlated with intelligence in machines as they are correlated in humans (Deary et al. 2001)? Or, what makes a set of psychometric tests different from a set of “human intelligence tasks” in AmazonMechan”
• A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: The Deary-Liewald reaction time task (2011, methodology): “The numbers reaction time box was employed for comparison, because there is much previous information about it: it has been used in large, epidemiological surveys in the UK, and its parameters’ associations with age, intelligence and mortality are known and replicated (Cox, Huppert, & Whittington, 1”