Combined fit of spectrum and composition data as measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory

By T. P. A. C. A. Aab, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta, I. A. Samarai, I. Albuquerque, I. Allekotte, A. Almela, J. A. Castillo, J. Álvarez-Muñiz, G. A. Anastasi and 389 more. 2016

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e70066c66a88025e5b9f2a11f627276ce6e9636c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

1. Tim Huege
2. Ralph Engel
3. Angela V. Olinto
4. K. Kampert
5. M. Unger
6. J. Biteau
7. Tanguy Pierog
8. R. Ulrich

Citations in the corpus

• An Indication of Anisotropy in Arrival Directions of Ultra-high-energy Cosmic Rays through Comparison to the Flux Pattern of Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Sources (2018, methodology): “At the same time, an instrumentation upgrade of the Observatory is being deployed on the water-Cherenkov detectors, adding a planar plastic scintillator of 4 m2 area to each of them(Aab et al. 2016b).”
• CRPropa 3—a public astrophysical simulation framework for propagating extraterrestrial ultra-high energy particles (2016, background): “In addition, the preferred values for the maximally injected energies are comparatively low so that the “cut-off” of the spectrum may not be dominated by interactions with background fields as predicted by the so-called GZK effect [11, 12] but rather be caused by the limited source energies [13].”
• IceCube-Gen2: the window to the extreme Universe (2020, background): “With the predicted sensitivity, IceCube-Gen2 will also be able to provide independent evidence for whether the observed cut-off in the flux of UHE cosmic rays is due to the GZK suppression or just due to reaching the limit of acceleration in the sources [243].”