Computational methods for plasticity

508 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Topological derivative-based topology optimization of structures subject to Drucker–Prager stress constraints (2012, methodology): “These parameters are obtained from the Drucker-Prager biaxial fit model [13] to match a tensile and compressive yield strength of fc = 30.”
On the existence of a unique class of yield and failure criteria comprising Tresca, von Mises, Drucker–Prager, Mohr–Coulomb, Galileo–Rankine, Matsuoka–Nakai and Lade–Duncan (2016, background): “[31] to deal with the cusps at the implementation level.”
A stabilized assumed deformation gradient finite element formulation for strongly coupled poromechanical simulations at finite strain (2013, background): “Furthermore, it can be easily shown that (53) is identical to the midpointassumed deformation gradient formulation in [32] if ̨ D 0 and the volume averaging of logJ.”