The political economy of armed conflict : beyond greed and grievance

By K. Ballentine, J. Sherman. 2003

476 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Paradigm in Distress? (2005, background): “This interpretation is rejected by Ballentine and Sherman (2003), Kalyvas (2001), and Newman (2004), among others.”
The political economy of peacebuilding: a critical theory perspective. (2005, background): “But a strong and active state role in planning and implementation (Ballentine and Sherman, 2003) with expansionist policies to increase employment, income generation and consumption power to wean vulnerable people off illegal activities through investment in public services and social protection,…”
Development and security (2004, unknown): “(Ballentine and Sherman, 2003, p. 259–260.)”
The Interaction of Narcotics and Conflict (2005, unknown): “Literature on economic incentives in civil war has challenged established notions of the driving forces in intrastate conflict (Keen, 1998; Collier & Hoeffler, 2004; Berdal & Malone, 2000a; Ballentine & Sherman, 2003).”
The political economy of the resource curse : a literature survey (2006, background): “However, several scholars have suggested that natural resources may in some cases reduce the intensity of conflict by encouraging combatants to cooperate in resource exploitation (Keen 1998; Ballantine 2003; Ross 2004b).”