Intergenerational Mobility and Marital Sorting
By J. Ermisch, Marco Francesconi, Thomas Siedler. 2006
220 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6e6e39bdd626497055c0026d350cc0c9c5dd6ed
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
In Political Science and International Relations
In Sociology and Political Science
- Sandra E. Black
- C. Nicoletti
- P. Devereux
- Chris I. Telmer
- Maia Güell
- J. R. Mora
- J. Hellerstein
- J. Ermisch
Citations in the corpus
- The Informational Content of Surnames, the Evolution of Intergenerational Mobility and Assortative Matin (2015, background): “…of both their father and their mother, and (ii) the manner in which boys and girls sort at the time 20The existing literature on mobility that incorporates assortative mating includes Lam and Schoeni (1993), Chadwick and Solon (2002), Ermisch, Francesconi, and Siedler (2006) and Holmlund (2006).”
- Recent Developments in Intergenerational Mobility (2010, background): “Ermisch et al. (2006) conclude that about 40% of family income persistence in the U.”
- Intergenerational Earnings Mobility: Changes across Cohorts in Britain (2008, methodology): “…for the period 1950-1972.13 Note that results on intergenerational mobility in earnings and in occupational prestige are very similar but the elasticity in occupational prestige is slightly lower than the one in earnings (this result is in line with that found in Germany by Ermisch et al. 2006).”
- Dads and Daughters: The Changing Impact of Fathers on Women's Occupational Choices (2011, background): “Ermisch et al. (2006) contains a model of general human capital investment and marriage.”
- Analyses of Intergenerational Mobility (2015, unknown): “…on social origins plays a crucial role for both genders, but a stronger one for women because a spouse’s contribution to household income tends to be larger for women than for men. ermisch, Francesconi, and Siedler (2006) use the same model and extend the analysis to a U.S.-Germany comparison.”
- Intergenerational Wealth Mobility in England, 1858–2012: Surnames and Social Mobility (2015, unknown): “For occupational mbolility see Ermisch et al., 2006 and the recent historical work of Long, 2012 and Long and Ferrie, 2013.”
- The Intergenerational Transmission of Risk and Trust Attitudes (2012, unknown): “As shown by Ermisch et al. (2006), this prestige measure exhibits a strong correlation with permanent income.”