Comparative manipulation of predation risk in incubating birds reveals variability in the plasticity of responses

By C. Ghalambor, T. E. Martin. 2002

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6e6d27c94e60f66204d16b9eaf7809c50a14ca3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

Adaptive versus non‐adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments (2007, background): “…& Nylin 1995), and has been empirically shown to occur in nature between ecotypes and species subject to different selection pressures (e.g. Cook & Johnson 1968; Carroll & Corneli 1999; Pigliucci, Cammell & Schmitt 1999; Morey & Reznick 2000; Haugen & Vøllestad 2000; Ghalambor & Martin 2002).”
Death and danger at migratory stopovers: problems with “predation risk” (2003, background): “Individuals can alter their allocation to anti-predator behavior in response to variation in their escape performance (see Fig. 2 of Ydenberg and Dill 1986) or the apparent level of danger in the environment ( Ghalambor and Martin, 2002 and many other examples).”
Increased parental care cost for nest-guarding fish in a lake with hyperabundant nest predators (2005, background): “In addition, parents must increase nest-defense behaviors when nest predators are abundant (Ghalambor and Martin, 2002; Popiel et al., 1996) or risk losing offspring.”
Predator-induced plasticity in nest visitation rates in the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus) (2005, background): “An alternative option to modify the pattern of nest visitation throughout the day would be to reduce the overall visitation rate (Ghalambor and Martin, 2002).”
Predator-induced reductions in nest visitation rates are modified by forest cover and food availability (2008, background): “However, evidence for this predator avoidance hypothesis comes mainly from interspecific comparative analyses (Martin et al. 2000a; Strickland and Waite 2001) and experimental field studies on short-term responses of parents to the threat posed by predation ( Ghalambor and Martin 2000, 2002 ).”
EFFECTS OF NEST HABITAT, FOOD, AND PARENTAL BEHAVIOR ON SHOREBIRD NEST SUCCESS (2007, background): “Where birds are not limited in their choice of nest site, behavioral factors such as nest defense or incubation recesses may have more impact on nest success (Cresswell 1997, Ghalambor and Martin 2002).”
Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in an island songbird exposed to a novel predation risk (2008, unknown): “Experimental manipulations of the perceived risk of predation have previously demonstrated that birds can assess changes in predation risk and modify a suite of reproductive behaviors in ways that appear adaptive (e.g., Ghalambor and Martin 2001, 2002; Eggers et al. 2006; Fontaine and Martin 2006)”
Testing ecological and behavioral correlates of nest predation (2007, background): “Individuals or species with safe nests are afforded the luxury of expressing behaviors that would be costly if expressed in unsafe nests (Martin and Ghalambor 1999, Martin et al. 2000a, 2000b, Ghalambor and Martin 2002, Fontaine and Martin 2006a).”