Performance Comparison Between Surface-Mounted and Interior PM Motor Drives for Electric Vehicle Application

By Gianmario Pellegrino, Alfredo Vagati, Paolo Guglielmi, Barbara Boazzo. IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982. Print), 2012

474 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6e5fa9d02601dddca8719ff3ea0e36fa3d7e168

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Gianmario Pellegrino
2. Alfredo Vagati
3. Paolo Guglielmi
4. Barbara Boazzo

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Gianmario Pellegrino
2. Alfredo Vagati
3. Paolo Guglielmi
4. Barbara Boazzo

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

1. Gianmario Pellegrino
2. Alfredo Vagati
3. Paolo Guglielmi
4. Barbara Boazzo

Citations in the corpus

• Design of Ferrite-Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Machines Robust Toward Demagnetization (2014, methodology): “Both surface-mounted PM (SPM) and interior PM (IPM) rotor types are used depending on the application [1], [2].”
• Research on the Performances and Parameters of Interior PMSM Used for Electric Vehicles (2016, background): “PMSMs (IPMSMs) are getting more attention for better PM utilization and wider constant power speed range (CPSR) relative to the surface-mounted PMSMs [7], [8].”