Temporal variation in predation risk: stage‐dependency, graded responses and fitness costs in tadpole antipredator defences

By A. Laurila, M. Järvi‐Laturi, Susanna Pakkasmaa, J. Merilä. 2004

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6e31fa09ef1723d2619102e4a98e74c94cb4c39

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. M. Ferrari
2. D. Chivers
3. Grant E. Brown
4. José Martín
5. P. López
6. Alix C. Rive
7. L. Amo
8. B. Wisenden

In Global and Planetary Change

1. M. Ferrari
2. D. Chivers
3. Grant E. Brown
4. José Martín
5. P. López
6. L. Amo
7. F. Messier
8. B. Wisenden

Citations in the corpus

• The paradox of risk allocation: a review and prospectus (2009, unknown): “Similarly, Laurila et al. (2004) exposed Rana temporaria tadpoles to visual or chemical cues of larval dragonfly every day or every 3 days.”
• Habitat deterioration affects body condition of lizards: A behavioral approach with Iberolacerta cyreni lizards inhabiting ski resorts (2007, background): “…to avoid the attack of predators that localize their prey by their movement (Hecnar and M’Closkey, 1998; Downes, 2001; Weber and Van Noordwijk, 2002; Laurila et al., 2004), or, when . movement is required, a modification of locomotor patterns (Martı́n and Salvador, 1997a; McAdam and Kramer,…”
• Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. (2010, unknown): “In contrast, Teplitsky et al. (2005) found that exposure to predators fed tadpoles results in delayed metamorphosis and smaller size, whereas Laurila et al. (2004, 2006) found that tadpoles raised in the presence of high risk had longer larval periods and were larger at metamorphosis.”
• Temporal variability, threat sensitivity and conflicting information about the nature of risk: understanding the dynamics of tadpole antipredator behaviour (2009, unknown): “Studies on a variety of prey animals, including amphibians, have provided mixed support for predictions of the risk allocation model (Van Buskirk et al. 2002; Laurila et al. 2004).”
• The dynamic nature of antipredator behavior: prey fish integrate threat-sensitive antipredator responses within background levels of predation risk (2006, background): “As with Helfman’s (1989) threat-sensitivity model, a growing body of literature is providing partial or full support for the risk allocation hypothesis (Hamilton and Heithaus 2001; Sih and McCarthy 2002; Foam et al. 2005a; Laurila et al. 2004; Mirza et al. 2006).”