Risky Business: A Few Provocations on the Regulation of Electronic Gaming Machines
By C. Livingstone, Richard Woolley. 2007
128 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6da19991af2d596280bbcff37c8ee0632a9f019
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Gambling and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Re-defining industry and state roles on duty of care, host responsibility and risk management (2008, background): “Concerns are that changes to gaming products interact with players, shaping behaviour that may produce or increase potential harm, especially for regular frequent gamblers (e.g. playing weekly or more) (Australian Institute for Primary Care, 2006; Livingston & Wooley, 2007).”
- ‘They are working every angle’. A qualitative study of Australian adults' attitudes towards, and interactions with, gambling industry marketing strategies (2012, result): “It is also important to note, however, that due to limitations with current problem gambling screening tools, and the way in which data are collected, may mean that the results of these studies may be indicative at best, and misleading at worst (Livingstone & Woolley, 2007 ).”
- “Big Gambling”: The rise of the global industry-state gambling complex (2015, background): “In this way, the pathological gambler, rather than the process of gambling liberalisation, has been constructed and mobilised as the object of policy and intervention (Collins, 2006; Livingstone & Woolley, 2007; Reith, 2007; Young, 2013a, 2013b).”