Sensitivity of Simulated Climate to Horizontal and Vertical Resolution in the ECHAM5 Atmosphere Model

By E. Roeckner, R. Brokopf, M. Esch, Marco A. Giorgetta, Stefan Hagemann, L. Kornblueh, E. Manzini, U. Schlese, Uwe Schulzweida. 2006

1,253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6d0dbe5bec786be4654dfd4806f15daf2486e0b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. J. Golaz
2. Johann Jungclaus
3. Bjorn Stevens
4. V. Larson
5. E. Manzini
6. Adam A. Scaife
7. Jochem Marotzke
8. C. Cagnazzo

In Global and Planetary Change

1. J. Golaz
2. Bjorn Stevens
3. Jochem Marotzke
4. E. Manzini
5. Adam A. Scaife
6. C. Cagnazzo
7. V. Larson
8. Johann Jungclaus

Citations in the corpus

• An Overview of the Atmospheric Component of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (2019, methodology): “An informal look at climate models being used today indicate many put 22–28 layers between the surface and 18 km (e.g., Donner et al., 2011; Martin et al., 2011; Roeckner et al., 2006).”
• Deep-ocean heat uptake and equilibrium climate response (2013, background): “The spectral atmospheric model ECHAM5 is run at T31 resolution (*3.75 ) with 19 levels (Roeckner et al. 2003, 2006).”
• Sensitivity of tracer transport to model resolution, forcing data and tracer lifetime in the general circulation model ECHAM5 (2008, neutral): “This is in contrast to Roeckner et al. (2006) who found an improvement of the zonal mean climate state for increased horizontal resolution, but little change between T42L19 and T42L31.”
• Estimation of ECHAM5 climate model closure parameters with adaptive MCMC (2010, methodology): “Version 5.4 of the ECHAM5 atmospheric general circulation model (Roeckner et al., 2003, 2006) was used.”
• Stable water isotopes in the ECHAM5 general circulation model: Toward high‐resolution isotope modeling on a global scale (2011, methodology): “For the isotope‐relevant simulation of atmospheric temperatures, largest differences of up to 4°C between model values and the respective ERA data are detected in the polar upper troposphere and lower stratosphere [ Roeckner et al., 2006 ].”
• Lightning and convection parameterisations - uncertainties in global modelling (2007, methodology): “The processes of radiation and cloud microphysics are parameterised, as described in the ECHAM5 documentation (Roeckner et al., 2003, 2004).”
• Global distribution of the effective aerosol hygroscopicity parameter for CCN activation (2010, methodology): “EMAC is a combination of the ECHAM5 general circulation model15 (Roeckner et al., 2006) and the Modular Earth Submodel System (Jöckel et al., 2005, 2006).”
• Global model simulations of the impact of ocean-going ships on aerosols, clouds, and the radiation budget (2007, methodology): “We use the global aerosol climate model ECHAM5/MESSy1-MADE, hereafter referred to as E5/M1-MADE, that includes detailed aerosol and cloud microphysics to study the direct and indirect aerosol effects caused by international shipping.”
• Revealing differences in GCM representations of low clouds (2011, methodology): “4, Roeckner et al. 2006).”