The ascending neuromodulatory systems in learning by reinforcement: comparing computational conjectures with experimental findings.
By Cyriel M. A. Pennartz. 1995
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andrea Soltoggio
- Clay B. Holroyd
- William H. Alexander
- Michael G. H. Coles
- Olaf Sporns
- Suri R E
- Arbib M A
- Bargas J
Citations in the corpus
- Neuromodulation and plasticity in an autonomous robot (2002, background): “In computational models, neuromodulation may be viewed as exerting an influence on neuronal response functions, learning rates, or other model parameters (Doya, 2000; Fellous & Linster, 1998; Hasselmo, 1995; Hasselmo, Wyble, & Fransen, 2002; Pennartz, 1996; Servan-Schreiber, Printz, & Cohen, 1990).”
- Specific long-term memory traces in primary auditory cortex (2004, background): “If learning-induced plasticity in A1 develops through engagement of the NB, then NB stimulation should be able to substitute for a standard REINFORCER , such as food or shock, although no motivational reinforcement would be involved; NB stimulation itself is apparently not itself rewarding or punis”
- Modeling functions of striatal dopamine modulation in learning and planning. (2001, background): “However, it has been claimed that dopamine responses to 31 novel and physically salient stimuli are not consistent with this hypothesis (Pennartz 1995; Salamone et al. 1997).”
- An Embodied Model of Learning, Plasticity, and Reward (2002, background): “In computational models neuromodulatory functions may be implemented as an influence on the sharpness or nonlinearity of neuronal responses, learning and plasticity, or other model parameters (see, for example, ServanSchreiber, Printz, & Cohen 1990; Hasselmo, 1995; Pennartz, 1996; Fellous & Linster,”
- The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. (2002, background): “Although not universally accepted (e.g., Berridge & Robinson, 1998; Pennartz, 1996; Redgrave, Prescott, & Gurney, 1999), the temporal-difference hypothesis of mesencephalic dopaminergic function has been highly influential.”