Vulnerability and Chronic Poverty in Rural Sichuan
By N. McCulloch, M. Calandrino. 2003
159 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6ae6b3bc60a05cfd6d3a42903eadfa3d0dfb558
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Safety Research
In Sociology and Political Science
In Soil Science
Citations in the corpus
- Are Fishers Poor or Vulnerable? Assessing Economic Vulnerability in Small-Scale Fishing Communities (2009, background): “In particular, an increasing number of studies from both developed and developing countries have now demonstrated that poverty is often transitory in nature (Walker and Ryan, 1990; Duncan et al., 1993; Grootaert and Kanbur, 1995; McCulloch and Calandrino, 2003).”
- Not by Rent Alone: Analysing the Pro-Poor Functions of Small-Scale Fisheries in Developing Countries (2010, unknown): “More globally, this concept of vulnerability is now re-emerging strongly in the development literature as a key element in poverty (Moser, 1998, Prowse, 2003; McCulloch and Calandrino, 2003), and is particularly stressed in the context of the development implications of global climate change (Adger ”
- Predicting the poverty impacts of trade reform (2004, background): “1 A few of the studies in this category are: Deaton (1989, 2003); Ravallion (1990); Ravallion and van de Walle (1991); Levinsohn et al. (2000); Minot and Goletti (2000); McCulloch and Calandrino (2003).”
- Spatio-temporal patterns of rural poverty in China and targeted poverty alleviation strategies (2017, background): “…2000; Glauben et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2015), anti-poverty targets (Park et al., 2002; Gao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016), vulnerability to poverty (McCulloch and Calandrino, 2003; Ward, 2016; Cao et al., 2016), multi-dimensional poverty measurement (Wang and Alkire, 2009; Yu, 2013; Alkier et al.,…”
- The determinants of poverty dynamics in Indonesia: evidence from panel data (2013, background): “McCulloch and Calandrino (2003), in Sichuan, China, confirmed that chronic poverty is commonly found in rural (especially remote) areas, and Fields et al. (2003) found that households in urban areas have a higher probability of escaping from poverty.”
- Determinants of Income Mobility and Household Poverty Dynamics in South Africa (2005, background): “Data from rural China point towards rapidly increasing mobility from very low levels in the 1980s (Nee, 1994) and generally very high mobility at the low end of the distribution (McCulloch and Calandrino, 2002).”
- Targeted poverty alleviation and land policy innovation: Some practice and policy implications from China (2018, background): “…et al., 2012; Ward, 2016), the causes of poverty (Jalan and Ravallion, 2000; Glauben et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2005), vulnerability to poverty (McCulloch and Calandrino, 2003; Ward, 2016; Cao et al., 2016), multi-dimensional poverty measurement (Wang and Alkire, 2009; Yu, 2013; Alkire and…”
- Persistent Poverty in Rural China: Where, Why, and How to Escape? (2012, unknown): “Further, McCulloch and Calandrino (2003) use data from 1991 till 1995 collected in rural Sichuan and show that 44% were poor in at least one year.”
- The Foster–Greer–Thorbecke (FGT) poverty measures: 25 years later (2010, background): “McCulloch and Calandrino [96] distinguish three types of chronic poverty: (1) mean consumption across time being below the poverty line; (2) a high frequency of being in poverty over some time (or a high probability of being poor); and (3) a high degree of persistence in poverty.”
- The Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) Poverty Measures: Twenty-Five Years Later (2010, methodology): “McCulloch and Calandrino (2003) distinguish three types of chronic poverty: (1) mean consumption across time being below the poverty line; (2) a high frequency of 22 In principle, dimensional cutoffs could be determined using a participatory method, while the policymaker could select the number of…”