Is bigger better in plants? The hydraulic costs of increasing size in trees.
By J. Midgley. 2003
85 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6ac4b9c17f321803637b2de6748971e0330884d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Ecology
- N. Swenson
- P. M. Jørgensen
- Derek Eamus
- Jérôme Chave
- Brian J. Enquist
- James C. Stegen
- Ethan P. White
- M. Weiser
In Global and Planetary Change
- N. Swenson
- Derek Eamus
- Jérôme Chave
- Oliver L. Phillips
- Brian J. Enquist
- James C. Stegen
- Ethan P. White
Citations in the corpus
- Variation in above-ground forest biomass across broad climatic gradients (2011, background): “It has been hypothesized that maximum tree height is limited by stress on the water column (the hydraulic limitation hypothesis; Ryan and Yoder, 1997), and this hypothesis has received some empirical support (Midgley, 2003; Koch et al., 2004; Ryan et al., 2006).”
- Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests (2005, background): “Trees of large diameter show negative residuals, suggesting there are mechanical and/or physiological limits to height increase in large diameter trees (Niklas 1995; Midgley 2003).”