Across-Sample Incomparability of R2s and Additional Evidence on Value Relevance Changes Over Time

By Z. Gu. 2007

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6a8950b25e9e22ffe2e82f61b7d655daed6f49f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Clive Lennox
2. Jeffrey A. Pittman
3. Leif Atle Beisland
4. Daniel Aobdia
5. Omrane Guedhami
6. Asad Kausar
7. W. Robert Knechel
8. Jere R. Francis

In Management Information Systems

1. Jeffrey A. Pittman
2. Leif Atle Beisland
3. Clive Lennox

In Strategy and Management

1. Clive Lennox
2. Jeffrey A. Pittman
3. Leif Atle Beisland

Citations in the corpus

• Voluntary Audits Versus Mandatory Audits (2011, background): “Moreover, it is important to note that the R2 statistics are not comparable across studies that examine very different samples (Gu, 2007).”
• A Review of the Value Relevance Literature (2009, background): “According to Gu [37], several possible adjustments exist.”