Spatio‐temporal variation in the structure of pollination networks

By Y. Dupont, B. Padron, J. Olesen, T. Petanidou. 2009

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6a7711a9f011b5fc12c0825cab0f94c755407d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Historical climate‐change influences modularity and nestedness of pollination networks (2013, background): “…we now know that pollination networks often are modular and nested; specifi cally, modularity tends to prevail towards the tropics and in areas of high contemporary precipitation, whereas nestedness is especially pronounced in drier habitats (Olesen et al. 2007, Dupont et al. 2009, Fortuna et. al.”
Temporal variation in plant–pollinator networks from seasonal tropical environments: Higher specialization when resources are scarce (2018, background): “Other studies from temperate regions showed that these values are highly conserved between successive plant reproductive seasons (e.g. Alarcón, Waser, & Ollerton, 2008; Burkle & Irwin, 2009; Dupont et al., 2009; Fang & Huang, 2012; Olesen et al., 2008; Petanidou et al., 2008).”
Identifying Causes of Patterns in Ecological Networks: Opportunities and Limitations (2017, background): “…and compartments Reason Explanation Comment Chance Random variability in abundance or observations The abundance of many animals is highly variable (e.g., between years), and sampling ecological communities will inevitably yield highly variable data (Petanidou et al. 2008, Dupont et al. 2009).”
Linking plant phenology to conservation biology (2016, background): “Recent studies indicate great variability in the identity of plant–pollinator interactions (Burkle and Alarcon, 2011; Carstensen et al., 2014; Dupont et al., 2009), which could mediate compositional changes driven by phenological mismatches (Kaiser-Bunbury et al., 2010).”
Why flower visitation is a poor proxy for pollination: measuring single‐visit pollen deposition, with implications for pollination networks and conservation (2013, background): “Core problems of inadequacy of the underlying data sets (incomplete sampling or varied relative sampling intensity, Bl€uthgen et al. 2008; Gibson et al. 2011), and of inadequate temporal/spatial spread of sampling (Olesen et al. 2008; Dupont et al. 2009) have been addressed.”
Conservation and restoration of plant–animal mutualisms on oceanic islands (2010, background): “that island and mainland system are similar in their degree of species and interaction turnover (Dupont et al., 2009).”
Bees in the trees: Diverse spring fauna in temperate forest edge canopies (2021, background): “This is particularly important as tree species are often only in bloom for very short periods, and not consistently each year (e.g. Houle, 1999; Fernández-Martínez et al., 2012).”