Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election

By Maxwell McCombes, E. López-Escobar, Juan Pablo Llamas. 2000

370 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Issue News and Corporate Reputation: Applying the Theories of Agenda Setting and Issue Ownership in the Field of Business Communication (2006, background): “McCombs et al. (1997, 2000) also distinguish another dimension of the attribute agenda, the ''evaluative (or affective)'' dimension.”
A Meta-Analysis of News Media’s Public Agenda-Setting Effects, 1972-2015 (2018, background): “…was first tested in the United States, strong agenda-setting effects have also been observed in studies conducted in other countries (e.g., McCombs et al., 2000; Takeshita & Mikami, 1995), where their political and media system could be similar or different from that of the United States.”
The Validity of Sentiment Analysis: Comparing Manual Annotation, Crowd-Coding, Dictionary Approaches, and Machine Learning Algorithms (2021, methodology): “Traditionally, sentiment is measured using manual annotators and a codebook (for examples, see Aday, 2010; Cho, 2013; Dunaway et al., 2015; Elenbaas & De Vreese, 2008; Kleinnijenhuis et al., 2007, 2019; Martins et al., 2013; McCombes et al., 2000; Meijer & Kleinnijenhuis, 2006; Muddiman & Stroud, 20”
The Need for Orientation Towards News Media: Revising and Validating a Classic Concept (2005, background): “Furthermore, the second level of agenda setting also incorporates specific evaluations or journalistic assessments of issues (affective attributes; McCombs & Ghanem, 2001; McCombs et al., 2000).”