But Economics Is Not an Experimental Science

By Christopher A. Sims. 2010

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e66d909c41884b12f4906c3c55b14bb6a04e58b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Colin F. Camerer

Citations in the corpus

• The Promise and Success of Lab-Field Generalizability in Experimental Economics: A Critical Reply to Levitt and List (2011, background): “The guiding idea here is what Vernon Smith [1982] called “parallelism”: It is the hopeful assumption that the same general laws apply in all settings.”
• Mafia and Public Spending: Evidence on the Fiscal Multiplier from a Quasi-experiment (2014, unknown): “Thus, strictly speaking, our results cannot be compared with results from SVAR models– a point stressed by Sims (2010).”
• TRYGVE HAAVELMO AND THE EMERGENCE OF CAUSAL CALCULUS (2014, unknown): “Angrist and Pischke (2010) represented the “experimentalist” position and Keane (2010), Leamer (2010), Nevo and Whinston (2010), and Sims (2010) defending the structural approach.”