Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations?

By C. Both, M. van Asch, R. Bijlsma, A. B. van den Burg, M. Visser. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2009

689 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e66d66afc32cd4e2ffb1f153f95293a9bbdf7a8f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. (2014, background): “Both et al. (2009) have shown that the degree of matching between consumers' phenology with that of predators and of their food resource may explain why some organisms do adjust their phenology to climate change, while others do not.”
Warming advances top-down control and reduces producer biomass in a freshwater plankton community (2017, background): “For example, warming may disrupt plant herbivore synchrony and bird phenology in terrestrial systems (Both et al. 2009), reduce primary production in oceans (Polovina et al. 2008), and promote the occurrence of toxic cyanobacterial blooms in freshwater lakes (Paerl and Huisman 2008, Kosten et al.…”
European oak powdery mildew: impact on trees, effects of environmental factors, and potential effects of climate change (2012, background): “Furthermore, disruption in phenological synchrony could occur in some interactions, in particular if both partners do not respond in a similar way to temperature (Van Ash and Visser 2007; Both et al. 2009).”
The decline of moths in Great Britain: a review of possible causes (2013, background): “Thus, prolonged or high levels of asynchrony might cause population decreases in this moth species, although intense selection pressure to restore synchrony (or adaptive asynchrony) may rapidly redress this problem (van Asch et al., 2007; Both et al., 2009; Singer&Parmesan, 2010).”
Beyond nectar provision: the other resource requirements of parasitoid biological control agents (2016, background): “A potential impact of climate change for insects and plants is that the synchrony of phenology of interacting species may become disrupted (Harrington et al., 1999; Bale et al., 2002; Both et al., 2009).”
The unrealized potential of herbaria for global change biology (2017, background): “…specimens could be used to address a topic that has attracted much interest in climate change research: potential phenological asynchronies and ecological mismatches between associated species resulting from differential responses to warming climates (Post et al., 2008; Both et al., 2009).”
Loss and gains in ant–plant interactions mediated by extrafloral nectar: fidelity, cheats, and lies (2016, background): “Therefore, shifts in plant phenology and disruption of interactions between species are able to affect ant–plant mutualisms, influencing their strength, duration, and final outcomes (Memmott et al. 2007; Both et al. 2009; Singer and Parmesan 2010; Yang and Rudolf 2010).”
Biodiversity in a changing climate: a synthesis of current and projected trends in the US (2013, background): “Also likely to be at an elevated risk are species and populations with restricted ranges, those dependent on habitats expected to undergo major changes (Figure 1, X–AA), or those that exhibit little phenotypic plasticity, low genetic variability, or poor dispersal capabilities (Both et al. 2009).”
Understanding variation in behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a conceptual overview (2013, background): “While some organisms have adjusted appropriately, others have not (Both et al. 2009; Knudsen et al. 2011).”