The Stability of the Response Styles Questionnaire Rumination Scale in a Sample of Patients with Major Depression

By R. Bagby, Neil A. Rector, J. Bacchiochi, Carolina McBride. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2004

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Behavioral Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e66c4f95f09520beabd65530f378b1b76d00880d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Behavioral Neuroscience

1. Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
2. Ian H. Gotlib
3. Anson J. Whitmer
4. Sonja Lyubomirsky
5. M. Addis

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Ian H. Gotlib
2. Sonja Lyubomirsky
3. Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
4. Blair E. Wisco
5. Jutta Joormann
6. Anson J. Whitmer
7. A. Aldao
8. Lance L Hawley

Citations in the corpus

• Mindfulness Practice, Rumination and Clinical Outcome in Mindfulness-Based Treatment (2014, background): “The HRSD is widely used in research as an indicator of depressive symptomology due to its high interrater reliability (.78) (Sotsky and Glass 1983), high internal reliability (.46 to .97), and high retest reliability (.81 to .98) Bagby et al. (2004).”
• Brooding and Reflection Reconsidered: A Factor Analytic Examination of Rumination in Currently Depressed, Formerly Depressed, and Never Depressed Individuals (2011, methodology): “We should note that Treynor et al. (2003) used a 22-item version of the RRS scale, and Bagby et al. (2004) used a 21-item version; it is not clear why there are different versions of the full RRS scale.”
• Rethinking Rumination (2008, methodology): “Bagby et al. (2004), however, found evidence for relative stability of rumination scores even among patients being treated with antidepressants for a major depressive episode.”