Embedded Malware Detection Using Markov n-Grams
By M. Shafiq, Syed Ali Khayam, Muddassar Farooq. 2008
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Battista Biggio
- Davide Maiorca
- Giorgio Giacinto
- Fabio Roli
- Pavel Laskov
- Nedim Srndic
- Igino Corona
- Charles Smutz
In Information Systems
- Battista Biggio
- Davide Maiorca
- Giorgio Giacinto
- Pavel Laskov
- Fabio Roli
- Nedim Srndic
- Igino Corona
- Charles Smutz
In Signal Processing
- Battista Biggio
- Davide Maiorca
- Giorgio Giacinto
- Fabio Roli
- Pavel Laskov
- Nedim Srndic
- Igino Corona
- Charles Smutz
Citations in the corpus
- Practical Evasion of a Learning-Based Classifier: A Case Study (2014, background): “, [37], [38], [39], [40], which uses n-grams, or short byte sequences, as basic features.”
- Malicious PDF detection using metadata and structural features (2012, background): “Signature analysis and pattern matching has been studied extensively [26, 24] including specifically for PDF vulnerabilities [20, 16].”
- Detection of Malicious PDF Files Based on Hierarchical Document Structure (2013, methodology): “The technical realization of these two fundamental tasks is presented below.”
- Graph-based malware detection using dynamic analysis (2011, methodology): “The data transformation that we use, program trace to Markov chain, is similar to the Markov n-gram approach [32].”
- Opcode sequences as representation of executables for data-mining-based unknown malware detection (2013, background): “In a similar vein, substantial research has focussed on n-gram distributions of byte sequences and data mining [50, 71, 85, 67].”
- When a Tree Falls: Using Diversity in Ensemble Classifiers to Identify Evasion in Malware Detectors (2016, background): “However, most classifier evasion attempts, including nine targeted mimicry scenarios from two recent studies, are given an outcome of uncertain indicating that these observations cannot be given a reliable prediction by the classifier.”
- Towards Adversarial Malware Detection (2018, methodology): “Hence, we could only refer to what has been stated in the released papers [80, 82, 83, 89].”
- Comprehensive Analysis and Detection of Flash-Based Malware (2016, background): “The detection of embedded malware, however, is a research field of its own and ranges from statically matching shellcode signatures to finding suspicious code in different file containers [4, 39, 40, 50].”
- Static detection of malicious JavaScript-bearing PDF documents (2011, methodology): “For the end-user systems, some early work on the detection of potential exploits in PDF documents [13, 21] has gone largely unnoticed, and in practice the detection of malicious PDF documents still hinges upon signatures provided by security vendors.”
- Looking at the bag is not enough to find the bomb: an evasion of structural methods for malicious PDF files detection (2013, methodology): “The first approaches based on machine learning for malicious PDF detection proposed static analysis on the raw (byte-level) document, by means of n-gram analysis [25, 32] and decision trees [38].”