Improvement of Microphysical Parameterization through Observational Verification Experiment

By M. Stoelinga, P. Hobbs, C. Mass, J. Locatelli, Brian A. Colle, R. Houze, A. Rangno, Nicholas A. Bond, B. Smull, R. Rasmussen and 2 more. 2003

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The continuous ranked probability score for circular variables and its application to mesoscale forecast ensemble verification (2006, background): “…observational data is usually only available during field programs where a plethora of special observational platforms are deployed, including in situ aircraft, frequent radiosondes, ground-based radars, and additional surface observations (e.g. Bougeault et al. 2001; Stoelinga et al. 2003).”
Diagnosis of an Intense Atmospheric River Impacting the Pacific Northwest: Storm Summary and Offshore Vertical Structure Observed with COSMIC Satellite Retrievals (2008, background): “Concurrently, the second Improvement of Microphysical Parameterization through Observational Verification Experiment (IMPROVE-2, during 2001; Stoelinga et al. 2003) focused on assessing cloud micro-physics in orographic precipitation.”
Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Estimation in Complex Terrain (2005, background): “Quantitative estimates of precipitation from atmospheric models are limited by the model’s horizontal resolution, deficiencies in the microphysical parameterization schemes, and insufficient understanding of precipitation processes (Colle et al. 2000; Schultz et al. 2002; Stoelinga et al. 2003).”