Efficiency of Soil and Fertilizer Phosphorus Use in Time: A Comparison Between Recovered Struvite, FePO4-Sludge, Digestate, Animal Manure, and Synthetic Fertilizer

By C. Vaneeckhaute, J. Janda, E. Meers, Filip M. G. Tack. 2015

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e65180b4346611cb5774e0482e7c6a923a20c3d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

1. B. Spears
2. H. Jarvie

Citations in the corpus

• Use of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria in Maize and Sugarcane: Characteristics and Applications (2020, background): “Around 10–30% of the phosphorus fertilizer applied in the first year is absorbed by the roots of cane crop whereas an intensive amount accumulates in the soil as fixed P, not available to plants (Syers et al., 2008).”
• Phosphorus legacy: overcoming the effects of past management practices to mitigate future water quality impairment. (2013, background): “In studies comparing soils under forest and agricultural land use, concentrations of total P under agriculture can range from two- to 10-fold greater than background concentrations (geologic or native P) under forests (by ?300 mg kg−1), a legacy of historical P fertilization (Nash and Hannah, 2011; ”