The effect of herbivory on temporal and spatial dynamics of foliar nectar production in cotton and castor
By Felix L. Wäckers, D. Zuber, R. Wunderlin, F. Keller. 2001
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e64cfe829f4a5d81851ce1dd9d755765be040079
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Martin Heil
- T. C. Turlings
- K. Del‐Claro
- Christian Kost
- Felix L. Wäckers
- Jörg Romeis
- V. Rico‐Gray
- Jennifer A. Rudgers
In Insect Science
- Martin Heil
- Jörg Romeis
- Christian Kost
- T. C. Turlings
- Felix L. Wäckers
- J. Ruberson
- K. Del‐Claro
- V. Rico‐Gray
In Plant Science
- Martin Heil
- Christian Kost
- T. C. Turlings
- Felix L. Wäckers
- Jennifer A. Rudgers
- Jörg Romeis
- K. Del‐Claro
- J. Ruberson
Citations in the corpus
- Enemies of herbivores can shape plant traits: Selection in a facultative ant-plant mutualism (2004, background): “Induced EFN production occurs in cultivated cotton, G. barbadense and G. herbaceum (Mound 1962, Wackers and Wunderlin 1999, Wackers et al. 2001), and therefore may also play a role in the defensive strategies of the related G. thurberi.”
- Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. (2003, result): “The earlier reports (see above), along with more recent studies on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum, see Wäckers et al. 2001) and severalAcaciaspecies (M. Heil, S. Greiner, R. Krüger, unpublished manuscript), confirm that inducibility of EFN flow seems to be a taxonomically widespread phenomenon.”
- ABIOTIC FACTORS AND THE CONDITIONAL OUTCOME OF AN ANT–PLANT MUTUALISM (2005, background): “…induce plants to change their defense strategy, altering their levels of secondary compounds and the quantity and quality of extrafloral nectar and food bodies, which will, in turn, modify both ant and herbivore abundance (Agrawal and Rutter 1998, Linsenmair et al. 2001, Wäckers et al. 2001).”
- Herbivore‐induced plant volatiles induce an indirect defence in neighbouring plants (2006, background): “Information exchange between emitter- and receivertendrils via a systemic signal within the same plant (Dicke & Dijkman 2001; Wäckers et al. 2001) or via the rhizosphere between two different individuals (Chamberlain et al. 2001; Pickett et al. 2003) was excluded in Experiment 3, because we used…”
- Resistance Mechanisms Against Arthropod Herbivores in Cotton and Their Interactions with Natural Enemies (2013, background): “Four days after removal of the herbivore, nectar production decreased to pre-treatment levels (Wäckers et al., 2001).”
- HOW TO BE SWEET? EXTRAFLORAL NECTAR ALLOCATION BY GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM FITS OPTIMAL DEFENSE THEORY PREDICTIONS (2004, methodology): “Moreover, it had been used in previous cotton induction experiments (Wäckers et al. 2001, Bezemer et al. 2003).”
- Plant Defense against Insect Herbivores (2013, background): “The production of EFN is increased by herbivory and decreased in the absence of herbivory [370,371].”
- Loss and gains in ant–plant interactions mediated by extrafloral nectar: fidelity, cheats, and lies (2016, background): “Based on EFN-bearing plants phenological variation studies (e.g. Heil et al. 2000; Wäckers et al. 2001; Lange et al. 2013; Vilela et al. 2014), followed by manipulative field experiments (e.”
- Induction of two indirect defences benefits Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus, Fabaceae) in nature (2004, background): “Journal of Ecology 2004 92 , 527–536 © 2004 British Ecological Society Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.Induction of two indirect defences benefits Lima bean ( Phaseolus lunatus , Fabaceae) in nature”
- Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. (2008, background): “Increases in EFN secretion upon herbivory and/or mechanical damage were also demonstrated for cotton and castor (Wäckers et al., 2001), the Bignoniaceae Catalpa bignonioides (Ness, 2003), and several species of the Faboideae (Heil, 2004) and the Mimosoideae (Heil et al.”
- EXTRAFLORAL NECTAR AS A RESOURCE MEDIATING MULTISPECIES INTERACTIONS (2004, background): “Following leaf damage, several species, including cultivated cotton, increase production of EF nectar (Agrawal and Rutter 1998, Heil et al. 2001, Wäckers et al. 2001, Ness 2003).”
- Extrafloral nectar from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) as a food source for parasitic wasps (2006, background): “Plants may actively increase their EFN production in response to herbivore attack (Wäckers et al. 2001) and thereby optimize their indirect defence.”
- Recruitment of predators and parasitoids by herbivore-injured plants (2004, background): “To reduce these ecological costs, plants may have adapted the extrafloral nectar composition to exclude unintended visitors and to cater selectively to those insects from which they benefit (Wäckers et al., 2001).”