Merging second-person and first-person neuroscience

By Fred Cummins. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2013

658 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The target article's approach is applauded, but it is suggested that the “dark matter” may be much larger than even the current authors suspect. Cartesian and mechanistic assumptions infuse not only the discipline of cognitive psychology, but all societal accounts of the person. A switch to dynamical accounts in which lawfulness is observed within a given systemic context is suggested.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e64092a4fcc5e392b99c9c4845bd942d3c33e6c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Erik Rietveld
2. Evan F. Risko
3. Damiaan Denys
4. Maarten van Westen
5. Julian Kiverstein
6. Daniel C. Richardson
7. Alan Kingstone

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Erik Rietveld
2. Evan F. Risko
3. Julian Kiverstein

In Social Psychology

1. Erik Rietveld
2. Evan F. Risko
3. Damiaan Denys
4. Maarten van Westen
5. Julian Kiverstein
6. Alan Kingstone

Citations in the corpus

• Breaking the Fourth Wall of Cognitive Science (2016, background): “…and in natural social contexts demonstrated that the paradigms that yielded the former were failing to capture some critical attribute of social attention—an idea that is currently drawing much interest (e.g., Pfeiffer, Vogeley, & Schilbach, 2013; Schilbach, 2015; Schilbach et  al., 2013).”
• A Rich Landscape of Affordances (2014, positive): “…we have begun to apply the ideas set out in this article is in psychiatry to understand the changes that patients suffering with obsessivecompulsive disorder (OCD) undergo when undergoing treatment with deep brain stimulation (DBS; De Haan, Rietveld, Stokhof, & Denys, 2013; Rietveld et al., 2013).”
• Ecological-Enactive Cognition as engaging with a field of relevant affordances (2018, background): “2011; Withagen, Araújo and De Poel 2017), affective science (Frijda, Ridderinkhof, and Rietveld 2014), and neuroscience (Friston et al. 2012; Schilbach et al. 2013; Dotov 2014; Dotov et al. 2010; Kirchhoff 2015; Jelic 2016; Pezzulo and Cisek 2016).”