Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States.
By N. Congdon, Benita J. O’Colmain, Caroline C. W. Klaver, Ronald Klein, B. Munoz, D. Friedman, J. Kempen, H. Taylor, P. Mitchell. A M A Archives of Ophthalmology, 2004
2,678 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e63937184c8bc856924c06a7c584c8c48c573fc8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Citations in the corpus
- Assessment of feedback modalities for wearable visual aids in blind mobility (2017, neutral): “Visual impairment includes the subcategories of blindness (best vision of (cid:20) 20/200 in the better eye in the United States and 20/400 by the WHO) and low vision ( 20/40 in the United States and 20/60 according to the WHO) and are due to a myriad of causes [2].”
- The Impact of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation on RPE Degeneration in Non-neovascular AMD (2017, background): “It is the leading cause of vision loss among the elderly in the United States and western societies (Congdon et al., 2004) and is a major public health problem that costs $30 billion annually in the United States (Brown et al., 2005a).”
- Clinical risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2010, background): “In all, 128 unduplicated references were initially identified as being of potential relevance (the search was repeated in November 2008 and seven additional articles published in 2008 were included [27-32]), with 12 additional articles retrieved from the reference lists.”
- DeepSeeNet: A deep learning model for automated classification of patient-based age-related macular degeneration severity from color fundus photographs (2018, methodology): “The specific aims of the study were: (1) to compare the performance of three deep learning models generated by three different training strategies; (2) for the most accurate of these three models, to compare its performance with that of retinal specialists (AREDS investigators whose assessments had ”