A Comparison of Two Techniques for Wood Fibre Isolation ‐ Evaluation by Tensile Tests on Single Fibres with Different Microfibril Angle

By I. Burgert, J. Keckes, K. Frühmann, P. Fratzl, S. Tschegg. 2002

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Mechanics of Materials, Polymers and Plastics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e637a85ec0004ad68ecfcd89a1a1bfa3832f3df1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. I. Burgert
2. L. Salmén
3. L. Donaldson

In Mechanics of Materials

1. L. Salmén
2. L. Donaldson

In Polymers and Plastics

1. L. Salmén

Citations in the corpus

• Cell wall features with regard to mechanical performance. A review COST Action E35 2004–2008: Wood machining – micromechanics and fracture (2009, background): “This has been demonstrated in studies on tissues (Cave 1969; Reiterer et al. 1999) and on individual wood fibres (Page and El-Hosseiny 1983; Burgert et al. 2002; Groom et al. 2002).”
• Effect of alkali treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of individual bamboo fibers (2016, background): “There have been lots of researches studied on the mechanical properties of natural fiber, e.g. wood (Burgert et al. 2002; Groom et al. 2002), jute (Saha et al. 2010), kenaf and ramie (Wang et al. 2011).”